Peer Reviewer Guidelines
Below are samples of rubrics used for the peer review process. These match the submission types.
Research Articles:
Title of Article: | ||
Score (1-5)
5 being the best |
Suggestions | |
Purpose
(The point the author wants to convey is clearly stated) |
||
Background
(Thorough development of pertinent information) |
||
Content
(Thesis is well supported with evidence; concise; analysis of research included) |
||
Conclusion
(Ties together all presented information concisely and makes a final overarching comment on the topic) |
||
Methods (if pertinent)
(Processes clearly stated) |
||
Language
(Submission is written in a formal and technical language, audience = scientists in the field discussed) |
||
Format
(1.5 spacing, 2000-3000 words (not including references) |
||
References
(Citations are listed numerically as they are used) |
||
Overall Impression | ||
Approval (if pertinent)
(From professor directly involved, eg laboratory advisor) |
||
Acceptance to Publication (Yes (with/without) revisions or No) |
Research News:
Title of Article: | ||
Score (1-5)
5 being the best |
Suggestions | |
Background
(A very concise introduction is provided) |
||
Content
(Informative yet interesting; concise) |
||
Language
(Broad terminology, informal writing style, audience = general public) |
||
Format
(1.5 spacing, 300-750 words) |
||
References
(Include the article from which the information was drawn) |
||
Overall impression | ||
Acceptance to Publication
(Yes (with/without) revisions or No) |
Creative Content:
Writing (e.g. Book Reviews, Opinions, Experiences)
Title of Article: | ||
Score (1-5)
5 being the best |
Suggestions | |
Content
(Shares informative thoughts on a scientific topic; makes a clear stance of how the author feels) |
||
Language
(Appropriate , informal; concise; audience=general public) |
||
Format
(1.5 spacing, 300-750 words) |
||
References
(Included if applicable) |
||
Overall impression | ||
Acceptance to Publication
(Yes (with/without) revisions or No) |
Art (e.g. Art, Cartoons, Videos)
Title of Piece: | ||
Score (1-5)
5 being the best |
Suggestions | |
Content
(Appropriate, science-related, informative if applicable) |
||
Format
(Video 3-5 mins, artwork size?) |
||
Overall impression | ||
Acceptance to Publication
(Yes (with/without) revisions or No) |
“Fun” science (e.g. jokes, fun facts)
Title: | ||
Score (1-5)
5 being the best |
Suggestions | |
Content
(Appropriate, joke is funny, informal) |
||
References
(Included if applicable) |
||
Overall impression | ||
Acceptance to Publication
(Yes (with/without) revisions or No) |